Not Yet RecruitingNot applicableNCT07814872
Official study title

A Preregistered Multi-Cohort Evaluation of the FATHOM AI System for Molecular Testing Prioritization to Support Clinical Trial Enrollment

Study summary

Many clinical trials evaluating cancer treatments require patients to undergo testing for specific molecular markers as part of eligibility screening, typically using immunohistochemistry or sequencing. Because relatively few patients may carry a required marker, trial investigators often test large numbers of patients to identify the few who may ultimately qualify for enrollment. Pathology laboratories routinely produce hematoxylin-and-eosin (H\&E) slides during cancer diagnosis. Pathology foundation models-large neural networks pretrained on millions of histology images-have shown promise in predicting molecular characteristics from these slides. Researchers can use these models to build classifiers that predict specific molecular markers and prioritize patients for confirmatory testing. This study evaluates FATHOM (Facilitating Accrual through Tumor Histology and Omics Matching), an autonomous research system powered by large multimodal models. Its agents read registered clinical trial records, identify molecular markers used as enrollment criteria, build prediction models using pathology foundation models, select the individual models or model combinations that best meet prespecified criteria, set their decision thresholds, and determine whether to deploy them. Together, a prediction model, its decision threshold, and the decision to deploy it constitute an AI prediction policy. Before FATHOM runs, the investigators preregister the clinical trial records that its agents may read, the cutoff date that defines which trial information they may use, the rules governing the agents, and the analysis plan. The system timestamps and locks each policy immediately after an agent produces it. The investigators then apply the policies to archived patient slides and compare their predictions with existing molecular marker results. The primary outcome is the proportion of prespecified evaluation scenarios in which an agent-generated policy, compared with universal molecular testing, either enriches the population selected for confirmatory testing with marker-positive patients or safely spares patients from confirmatory testing while meeting prespecified performance criteria. This study analyzes existing pathology images and clinical trial records only. It does not enroll or contact patients, influence patient care, or affect participation in any clinical trial.

Ask AI to explain this study
Start here

Key things to know

Main goalNot specified

This describes the study’s primary purpose.

What is being studiedNot specified

The study team can explain what participation involves.

Who it may be forNeoplasms (Cancer / Tumors) · Colorectal Neoplasms

These are broad labels—not an eligibility decision.

Checked against the public recordLast updated Sep 11, 2026 · Source: ClinicalTrials.gov

Is enrollment open?Not Yet Recruiting

The study is not accepting participants yet.

What kind of study?Not applicable

Observational

Where is it offered?1 U.S. location

Locations may change over time.

Who runs it?Harvard Medical School (HMS and HSDM)

Study sponsor

01
Study overview

What this study is about

Purpose
Not specified
Study type
Observational
Phase
Not applicable
Sponsor
Harvard Medical School (HMS and HSDM)
Interventions being studied
Not specified
02
Explore related studies

How this study is categorized

These labels come from structured fields and exact terms in the public record.

03
Public criteria

Who may be able to participate

The sponsor separates these requirements into two groups. You do not need to interpret them alone—use them to guide a conversation with the study team.

Requirements people may need to meetInclusion criteria
  • Patients with a histologically confirmed cancer
  • Availability of relevant molecular profiling results
  • At least one diagnostic hematoxylin and eosin (H\&E) whole-slide image
Reasons someone may not be able to joinExclusion criteria
  • Poor-quality or unreadable slides, assessed independently of model output
  • Patients whose slides were used to train a policy's classifier, for that policy's evaluation

Important: This is the sponsor’s public criteria, not a determination of eligibility. The study team must review your individual situation.

04
Study sites

U.S. locations

  • Harvard Medical SchoolBoston, Massachusetts

Source and freshness
Processed from ClinicalTrials.gov. Last public update: Sep 11, 2026. Always confirm current availability with the study team.

View original record ↗