Erector Spinae Versus Intercostal Nerve Blocks With Liposomal Bupivacaine for Analgesia in Thoracic Surgery
This clinical trial compares efficacy in postoperative pain management in thoracic surgery between erector spinae block versus liposomal bupivacaine injections.
Ask AI to explain this studyKey things to know
This describes the study’s primary purpose.
The study team can explain what participation involves.
These are broad labels—not an eligibility decision.
Checked against the public recordLast updated Apr 9, 2026 · Source: ClinicalTrials.gov
The study is currently accepting participants.
Interventional
Locations may change over time.
Study sponsor
What this study is about
- Purpose
- Treatment
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Sponsor
- George Washington University
- Interventions being studied
- Drug: Erector Spinae (ESP) Block with Bupivacaine (Marcaine®); Drug: Intercostal nerve block
How this study is categorized
These labels come from structured fields and exact terms in the public record.
Who may be able to participate
The sponsor separates these requirements into two groups. You do not need to interpret them alone—use them to guide a conversation with the study team.
Video assisted pulmonary resection, pleurodesis or decortication
- Allergy to local anesthetics
- Patient undergoing bilateral surgery
- Surgery is emergent as deemed by the principal investigator
Important: This is the sponsor’s public criteria, not a determination of eligibility. The study team must review your individual situation.
U.S. locations
- The George Washington University HospitalWashington D.C., District of Columbia
Source and freshness
Processed from ClinicalTrials.gov. Last public update: Apr 9, 2026. Always confirm current availability with the study team.