Testing Radon Com Methods: Clinical Trial Smartphone App vs Print Brochures
The purpose of this research study is to compare the effectiveness of radon information delivered via the radon app vs. a traditional approach (printed brochure). The prevalence of exceptionally high levels of residential radon in ND, coupled with public's poor understanding of this hazard, is a critical public health problem.
Checked against the public recordLast updated Nov 2, 2022 · Source: ClinicalTrials.gov
What this study is about
- Purpose
- Prevention
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Not applicable
- Sponsor
- University of North Dakota
- Interventions being studied
- Other: The radon app; Other: Print brochure
How this study is categorized
These labels come from structured fields and exact terms in the public record.
Who may be able to participate
Inclusion Criteria: * The principal eligibility criterion is that participants own a smartphone. Exclusion Criteria: * The principal exclusion criterion is previous testing for radon within the past two years.
Important: This is the sponsor’s public criteria, not a determination of eligibility. The study team must review your individual situation.
U.S. locations
- University of North DakotaGrand Forks, North Dakota
Source and freshness
Processed from ClinicalTrials.gov. Last public update: Nov 2, 2022. Always confirm current availability with the study team.