Testing Radon Com Methods: Clinical Trial Smartphone App vs Print Brochures
The purpose of this research study is to compare the effectiveness of radon information delivered via the radon app vs. a traditional approach (printed brochure). The prevalence of exceptionally high levels of residential radon in ND, coupled with public's poor understanding of this hazard, is a critical public health problem.
Ask AI to explain this studyKey things to know
This describes the study’s primary purpose.
The study team can explain what participation involves.
These are broad labels—not an eligibility decision.
Checked against the public recordLast updated Nov 2, 2022 · Source: ClinicalTrials.gov
Ask the study team to confirm whether enrollment is open.
Interventional
Locations may change over time.
Study sponsor
What this study is about
- Purpose
- Prevention
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Not applicable
- Sponsor
- University of North Dakota
- Interventions being studied
- Other: The radon app; Other: Print brochure
How this study is categorized
These labels come from structured fields and exact terms in the public record.
Who may be able to participate
The sponsor separates these requirements into two groups. You do not need to interpret them alone—use them to guide a conversation with the study team.
The principal eligibility criterion is that participants own a smartphone.
The principal exclusion criterion is previous testing for radon within the past two years.
Important: This is the sponsor’s public criteria, not a determination of eligibility. The study team must review your individual situation.
U.S. locations
- University of North DakotaGrand Forks, North Dakota
Source and freshness
Processed from ClinicalTrials.gov. Last public update: Nov 2, 2022. Always confirm current availability with the study team.