RecruitingNot applicableNCT03623958

Image Guided VATS vs. VATS Resection

To evaluate workflow and outcomes of iVATS and standard VATS for small pulmonary nodules. The outcomes of the patients will be evaluated separately as there will be no direct comparison of the two arms.

Checked against the public recordLast updated Nov 13, 2025 · Source: ClinicalTrials.gov

StatusRecruiting
PhaseNot applicable
U.S. locations1
SponsorBrigham and Women's Hospital
01
Study overview

What this study is about

Purpose
Treatment
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Not applicable
Sponsor
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Interventions being studied
Device: Image guided Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery (VATS) resection; Procedure: Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery
02
Explore related studies

How this study is categorized

These labels come from structured fields and exact terms in the public record.

Treatment approach
03
Public criteria

Who may be able to participate

Inclusion Criteria: * Subject must be 18 years and older * Subject must be deemed a candidate for the iVATS surgery, by their treating Thoracic Surgeon * Subject must have nodules/GGO or other abnormal opacity that can be accurately measured in at least one dimension with longest diameter ≤ 20 mm or 2cm * Subject's lesions that are located in the outer half portion of the lung/lobe. * Subjects must be evaluated at BWH and/or DFCI Thoracic Surgery outpatient clinics Exclusion Criteria: * If participant is a pregnant woman or breast feeding they will not be eligible. * If treating thoracic surgeon deems the participant not eligible for the study.

Important: This is the sponsor’s public criteria, not a determination of eligibility. The study team must review your individual situation.

04
Study sites

U.S. locations

  • Brigham and Women's HospitalBoston, Massachusetts

Source and freshness
Processed from ClinicalTrials.gov. Last public update: Nov 13, 2025. Always confirm current availability with the study team.

View original record ↗