CompletedNot applicableNCT03347825

Retrospective Multi-Center Study to Compare Perioperative Outcomes for Robotic-assisted Lobectomy With Those Associated With VATS and Open Lobectomy for Lung Cancer

The main objective of this study is to evaluate and compare peri-operative outcomes of lobectomy compare with different approaches. The study aims to include patients with stage IA, IB, IIA, IIB and IIIA lung cancer that underwent lobectomy via robotic-assisted, VATS and open approach.

Checked against the public recordLast updated Feb 3, 2021 · Source: ClinicalTrials.gov

StatusCompleted
PhaseNot applicable
U.S. locations1
SponsorIntuitive Surgical
01
Study overview

What this study is about

Purpose
Not specified
Study type
Observational
Phase
Not applicable
Sponsor
Intuitive Surgical
Interventions being studied
Procedure: Robotic-assisted lobectomy using da Vinci Surgical System; Procedure: VATS (video assisted thoracic surgery); Procedure: Open lobectomy
02
Explore related studies

How this study is categorized

These labels come from structured fields and exact terms in the public record.

Treatment approach
03
Public criteria

Who may be able to participate

Inclusion Criteria: * Subject is 18 years or older * Subject who has undergone elective robotic-assisted, VATS or open lobectomy for clinically diagnosed primary stage IA, IB, IIA, IIB and IIIA lung cancer, with or without neo-adjuvant therapy Exclusion Criteria: * Subject with stage IIIB lung cancer * Subject who received lobectomy as an emergent procedure * Subjects who received lobectomy for metastatic cancer

Important: This is the sponsor’s public criteria, not a determination of eligibility. The study team must review your individual situation.

04
Study sites

U.S. locations

  • BaylorScott&WhiteDallas, Texas

Source and freshness
Processed from ClinicalTrials.gov. Last public update: Feb 3, 2021. Always confirm current availability with the study team.

View original record ↗