Efficacy and Safety Study of ABP 215 Compared With Bevacizumab in Patients With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
The purpose of this research study is to compare the effectiveness and safety of ABP 215 against bevacizumab in men and women with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
Ask AI to explain this studyKey things to know
This describes the study’s primary purpose.
Plus 2 other study approaches.
These are broad labels—not an eligibility decision.
Checked against the public recordLast updated Oct 19, 2017 · Source: ClinicalTrials.gov
Ask the study team to confirm whether enrollment is open.
Interventional
Locations may change over time.
Study sponsor
What this study is about
- Purpose
- Treatment
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Sponsor
- Amgen
- Interventions being studied
- Drug: Carboplatin; Drug: Paclitaxel; Drug: ABP 215; Drug: Bevacizumab
How this study is categorized
These labels come from structured fields and exact terms in the public record.
Who may be able to participate
The sponsor separates these requirements into two groups. You do not need to interpret them alone—use them to guide a conversation with the study team.
- Histologically or cytologically confirmed non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
- Subjects must be initiating first-line carboplatin/paclitaxel chemotherapy within 8 days after randomization and expected to receive at least 4 cycles of chemotherapy
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status score 0 or 1
- Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) or mixed SCLC and NSCLC
- Central nervous system (CNS) metastases
- Malignancy other than NSCLC
- Palliative radiotherapy for bone lesions inside the thorax
- Prior radiotherapy of bone marrow
- Known to be positive for hepatitis B surface antigen (HbsAg), hepatitis C virus (HCV), or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)
- Life expectancy \< 6 months
- Woman of child-bearing potential who is pregnant or is breast feeding or who is not consenting to use highly effective methods of birth control during treatment and for an additional 6 months after the last administration of the protocol specified treatment
- Man with a partner of childbearing potential who does not consent to use highly effective methods of birth control during treatment and for an additional 6 months after the last administration of the protocol specified treatment
- Subject has known sensitivity to any of the products to be administered during the study, including mammalian cell derived drug products
- Other inclusion/
Important: This is the sponsor’s public criteria, not a determination of eligibility. The study team must review your individual situation.
U.S. locations
- Research SiteBismarck, North Dakota
- Research SiteFremantle, Western Australia
- Research SiteVeliko Tarnovo, Veliko Tarnovo
- Research SiteRousse
Source and freshness
Processed from ClinicalTrials.gov. Last public update: Oct 19, 2017. Always confirm current availability with the study team.