CompletedPhase 3NCT01328951
Official study title

A Study of First-line Maintenance Erlotinib Versus Erlotinib at Disease Progression in Participants With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Who Have Not Progressed Following Platinum-Based Chemotherapy

Study summary

This double-blind, placebo-controlled study will evaluate the benefit of first-line maintenance erlotinib (Tarceva) versus erlotinib at the time of disease progression in participants with advanced NSCLC who have not progressed following 4 cycles of platinum based-chemotherapy and whose tumor does not harbor an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-activating mutation. Participants will be randomized to receive either erlotinib 150 milligrams (mg) orally (PO) once daily or placebo. Participants who progress on placebo will receive erlotinib 150 mg PO once daily as second-line therapy, and those who progress on erlotinib may switch to a non-investigational, second-line chemotherapy. Treatments will continue until disease progression, death, or unacceptable toxicity. Participants may also be entered into a final Survival Follow-Up (SFU) period upon treatment discontinuation.

Ask AI to explain this study
Start here

Key things to know

Main goalTreatment

This describes the study’s primary purpose.

What is being studiedPlacebo and Erlotinib

Plus 1 other study approaches.

Who it may be forNon-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) · EGFR

These are broad labels—not an eligibility decision.

Checked against the public recordLast updated Oct 28, 2016 · Source: ClinicalTrials.gov

Is enrollment open?Completed

Ask the study team to confirm whether enrollment is open.

What kind of study?Phase 3

Interventional

Where is it offered?155 U.S. locations

Locations may change over time.

Who runs it?Hoffmann-La Roche

Study sponsor

01
Study overview

What this study is about

Purpose
Treatment
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Sponsor
Hoffmann-La Roche
Interventions being studied
Drug: Placebo; Drug: Erlotinib; Drug: Second-Line Chemotherapy
02
Explore related studies

How this study is categorized

These labels come from structured fields and exact terms in the public record.

03
Public criteria

Who may be able to participate

The sponsor separates these requirements into two groups. You do not need to interpret them alone—use them to guide a conversation with the study team.

Requirements people may need to meetInclusion criteria
  • Adults greater than or equal to (≥) 18 years of age, or legal age of consent if greater than 18
  • Advanced or recurrent (Stage IIIB) or metastatic (Stage IV) NSCLC
  • Completion of 4 cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy without progression (end of last chemotherapy cycle less than or equal to \[≤\] 28 days prior to randomization)
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0 or 1
Reasons someone may not be able to joinExclusion criteria
  • Prior exposure to agents directed at human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER) axis (e.g. erlotinib, gefitinib, cetuximab)
  • Participants whose tumors harbor an EGFR-activating mutation
  • Prior chemotherapy or therapy with systemic anti-neoplastic therapy for advanced disease before Screening
  • Use of pemetrexed in maintenance setting (pemetrexed allowed during the chemotherapy run-in)
  • Participants who have undergone complete tumor resection after responding to the platinum-based chemotherapy during the Screening phase
  • Any other malignancies within 5 years, except for curatively resected carcinoma in situ of the cervix, basal or squamous cell skin cancer, ductal carcinoma in situ, or organ-confined prostate cancer
  • Central nervous system (CNS) metastases or spinal cord compression that has not been definitely treated with surgery and/or radiation, or treated CNS metastases or spinal cord compression without stable disease for ≥2 months
  • Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B, or hepatitis C infection
  • Any inflammatory changes of the surface of the eye

Important: This is the sponsor’s public criteria, not a determination of eligibility. The study team must review your individual situation.

04
Study sites

U.S. locations

  • Study locationGilroy, California
  • Study locationWashington D.C., District of Columbia
  • Study locationKansas City, Missouri
  • Study locationMissoula, Montana
  • Study locationLebanon, New Hampshire
  • Study locationDayton, Ohio
  • Study locationChattanooga, Tennessee
  • Study locationSpokane, Washington
  • Study locationTacoma, Washington
  • Study locationBelo Horizonte, Minas Gerais
  • Study locationLajeado, Rio Grande do Sul
  • Study locationPorto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul

Source and freshness
Processed from ClinicalTrials.gov. Last public update: Oct 28, 2016. Always confirm current availability with the study team.

View original record ↗