CompletedNot applicableNCT01117740

Pleural Catheters Versus Thoracoscopic Pleurodesis

The goal of this clinical research study is to compare 2 different methods for treating a pleural effusion. Researchers also want to learn how the treatment you receive effects your quality of life (your ability to do the things you like to do and how happy you feel.

Checked against the public recordLast updated Apr 11, 2016 · Source: ClinicalTrials.gov

StatusCompleted
PhaseNot applicable
U.S. locations1
SponsorM.D. Anderson Cancer Center
01
Study overview

What this study is about

Purpose
Not specified
Study type
Observational
Phase
Not applicable
Sponsor
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
Interventions being studied
Behavioral: MDASI Questionnaire
02
Explore related studies

How this study is categorized

These labels come from structured fields and exact terms in the public record.

03
Public criteria

Who may be able to participate

Inclusion Criteria: 1. Patients with MPE who are suitable for either pleural catheter placement or thoracoscopic pleurodesis who subsequently have either procedure performed 2. Sufficient mental capacity to answer SF-6D and Borg score questions 3. Age 18 or older 4. Life expectancy \> 2 months 5. English or Spanish speaking Exclusion Criteria: 1. Patients undergoing pleurodesis for benign disease (e.g., spontaneous pneumothorax) 2. Inability or unwillingness to give informed consent 3. Inability to perform phone call follow-up 4. Pregnancy 5. Previous intrapleural therapy for MPE 6. Prior radiation therapy encompassing the entire hemithorax 7. Chylous effusions associated with malignant disease 8. Bilateral effusions requiring bilateral pleurodesis

Important: This is the sponsor’s public criteria, not a determination of eligibility. The study team must review your individual situation.

04
Study sites

U.S. locations

  • University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHouston, Texas

Source and freshness
Processed from ClinicalTrials.gov. Last public update: Apr 11, 2016. Always confirm current availability with the study team.

View original record ↗