CompletedPhase 2NCT00059722
Official study title

This Study is to Compare the Efficacy of ZD6474 and ZD1839 in Subjects With NSCLC.

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of ZD6474 and ZD1839 in patients with NSCLC after Failure of Prior Platinum-based Chemotherapy.

Ask AI to explain this study
Start here

Key things to know

Main goalTreatment

This describes the study’s primary purpose.

What is being studiedZD6474 and Placebo

Plus 1 other study approaches.

Who it may be forNon-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

These are broad labels—not an eligibility decision.

Checked against the public recordLast updated Aug 24, 2016 · Source: ClinicalTrials.gov

Is enrollment open?Completed

Ask the study team to confirm whether enrollment is open.

What kind of study?Phase 2

Interventional

Where is it offered?48 U.S. locations

Locations may change over time.

Who runs it?Genzyme, a Sanofi Company

Study sponsor

01
Study overview

What this study is about

Purpose
Treatment
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Sponsor
Genzyme, a Sanofi Company
Interventions being studied
Drug: ZD6474; Drug: Placebo; Drug: ZD1839
02
Explore related studies

How this study is categorized

These labels come from structured fields and exact terms in the public record.

03
Public criteria

Who may be able to participate

The sponsor separates these requirements into two groups. You do not need to interpret them alone—use them to guide a conversation with the study team.

Requirements people may need to meetInclusion criteria
  • Failure of either first-line and/or second-line chemotherapy either of which was platinum-based (the prior regimen must have failed the subject because of toxicity or progression of tumor
  • Prior histologic or cytologic confirmation of locally advanced or metastatic (IIIB/IV) NSCLC
Reasons someone may not be able to joinExclusion criteria
  • Subjects who have received second-line or subsequent chemotherapy
  • Any evidence of clinically active interstitial lung disease (patients with chronic, stable, radiographic changes who are asymptomatic, need not be excluded)

Important: This is the sponsor’s public criteria, not a determination of eligibility. The study team must review your individual situation.

04
Study sites

U.S. locations

  • Research SitePine Bluff, Arkansas
  • Research SiteLos Angeles, California
  • Research SitePalm Springs, California
  • Research SiteSan Diego, California
  • Research SiteBoca Raton, Florida
  • Research SiteJacksonville, Florida
  • Research SiteOrange Park, Florida
  • Research SiteCoeur d'Alene, Idaho
  • Research SiteChicago, Illinois
  • Research SiteIndianapolis, Indiana
  • Research SiteShreveport, Louisiana
  • Research SiteSaint Loius, Missouri

Source and freshness
Processed from ClinicalTrials.gov. Last public update: Aug 24, 2016. Always confirm current availability with the study team.

View original record ↗